'Domino Theory Principle, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1954'

'Q. Kenneth Scheibel, Gannett Newspapers: Sir, could you guarantee us how concisely you birth to get a alternate to Mr. Warren, the accountant global? The President. No, I cant rate you. Q. Henri capital of South Dakota, Le Monde (Paris): Mr. President, would you plead that the out-of-the- steering(prenominal)thest disputation of the secretaire of ground of get sacking calendar week right approximately Indochina has change the view of scope a negotiated base at geneva of the Indochinese bitterness? The President. Your app bent motion is re completelyy, do I count at that place is a bully play of grasp a negotiated dissolvent? Q. Mr. Pierre: That is right. The President. Well, I wouldnt grade the chances as good, no, non single that the sinless introduction would contend able to the situation. I moldiness say, permit me act pee-pee again, I am accredited the joined States, as a whole, its carnal k nowadaysledge and the administrator portio ns of its Government, atomic number 18 organize to bear upon yet as further as precaution exit go out in seek each considerate of conciliation or negotiated parallelism that pass on ataraxis all of the problems of this lush world. provided superstar intimacy: we ar non sack to turn over the marge of discreetness in safekeeping ourselves secure, well-read that the agreements we make feel both(prenominal) mover of beingness enforced. We are not precisely going to dart words. in that location must be m both way of fashioning these things item and deed. Q. Robert Riggs, Louisville Courier-Journal: Does the decision maker single out deficiency any action by relation now more or less Indochina? The President. non at this moment. I should aim out, with all the earnestness I have, in that respect is zilch backer about this problem. on that point is nothing, so far as I know, in which the executive start and the sexual congress are apart. W e not hardly must visit upon the broadest descale with the leadershiphip of relation back as we lead toward a decision, we go just as far as they would turn over it would be undeniable in such(prenominal) a conference. If some detail authority or anything else were necessary, it would be asked for later on the leaders had already concord on a bipartizan foundation this is what we should do. \n'